unknown those could have been no Malice in the writer who I understood obtained his information thiefly from
very competent authorit boord the Farris.
A
Who was on
ton" when the par preetid-
But
as
I am
both for the sake of the lopen
nof key
non character that
the China Grail, should not
tive to auty one;
ans
injustice
Dending the trunde If seint
& comment,
cial
beneficia
to insert a
Irm
ready
any infusation or explanation that Mr. Couron
Arr.
or his friends may deem tal- culated to set him right with the public this profession-
I presume it is justification of Character not bindictive
damages
Mr. Lawson sucks.
and
5
65
and this seems to be the radi
est mode of
of accomplishing
that end.
I
thall be
Bery
flade of it prove excessful
although I May-
he compelled
A admit that Mr. Lawson
has been conjustly maligned- But if
The required it
Mone
seems to me the truth
he more certaing
would be more
4. l. ex propinel sifted than in a Court of law, where the truth is too often shut out. by forms & technicalities - Instead of a joves
Jandom, a
to ken at
Bon refer
en Mutually chosen wond arrive at a more satisfac
tory
& convincing conclusion; Should the result be to ad judge
Suntop the passap complaine of. Intine & an hujust as- persion
on Mr Lawson, I
Shall
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.